W2
Wikipedia
The Wikimedia Foundation, NGO under which Wikipedia and its related
projects operate. They said that “Imagine a world in which every single human
being can freely share in the sum of knowledge. That’s our commitment.”
However, this is not really new. Wikipedia has vision like concerning for the
sum of all knowledge. And they believe it can bring about world peace and
goodwill would be necessary to its production and some consequence of
participation. Wikipedia is based on online collaborative editing tool, and “encyclopedia”.
Wiki as an encyclopedia means that evidence of a geeky sort of linguistic humor
and also prompts the question of whether a relatively open-to-all. And wiki can
be a high-quality reference work. Some said Wikipedia can be difficultly
getting a sense of the English community. There are many possibilities that
people can be active contributors who are familiar with the basic practices. It
includes smaller communities on the scale of hundreds or dozens of members
within various boundaries. And the English Wikipedia is part of a larger
community of multilingual encyclopedias and Wikimedia projects. Collective
intelligence includes many aspects of cultural backgrounds. We can approach
Wikipedia’s article based on diverse information. Core of Wikipedia is collaborative
principles. In addition to millions of encyclopedic articles, Wikipedia is
suffused with a coexisting web of practices, discussion, and policy pages, and
can be touched by Wikipedia projects. We can make “the more things change, the
more they stay the same.” Therefore, Wikipedia have to being approached through
universal access and vision of goodwill. Technological innovation can make this
vision. And by using technology, Wikipedia is inspired and spread.
Predicting the Future, Wikipedia community is going on during innovation
technology. Encyclopedia helps us look
back, look forward and struggle in their present to implement a universal
vision. People try and try again because for a long time we didn’t can do. And
that story is revealing in at least two ways. First of all, unfulfilled
visions, failed projects and obscure predictions tell us that something about
those people and their time. The history speaks to notion of an ambitious
project of human knowledge production and dissemination. Secondly, we have a
question, why did it take so long for the vision to be realized.
The result of technology make us help come together not real but
online without waste of any time and space. I think It can be named shrinking
community. Our collaborative intelligence is also realized by diverse devices
which can access whenever and wherever. It means I can do read articles and
edit more frequently. However, there are some regulations in Wikipedia. How can
we enact those laws? I guess till now, English Wikipedia is standard. But, it
is not reasonable. Because our collective information and intelligence made by
many people who have diverse background, it is not a belonging of “English
Wikipedia”. Therefore, we have to make sure what is good regulations.
As you said, I also think making reasonable regulation is important. But there will be many barrier. Because many people in various country use wikipedia, so there should agreement each other.
ReplyDelete